Can we prevent Earth quakes? Is it possible to predict it? With sufficient accuracy If No why?
These
are questions, we would like to address now Earthquakes, tsunamis and
volcanoes are just some of the deadly hazards ,we are exposed to, on
Earth. These
events shape our planet and affect, where and how we live. Can we prevent Earth quakes ,or can it be predicted if no why? These
are the questions we would like to address now
What is an earthquake?
An
earthquake is the shaking and vibration at the surface of the Earth
caused by energy being released along a fault plane, at the edge of a
tectonic plate or by volcanic activity.
Earthquakes
are caused by the movement of Earth’s outer layer (the crust and a
portion of the upper mantle).
The outside layer of Earth is split intotectonic
plates,which are moving slightly due to the movement
of magma in the layer below. This causes plates to squeeze together,
move apart and slide alongside each other. Earthquakes are classified
into two types:
1.Interplate earthquakes
These
earthquakes occur on tectonic plate boundaries where the tectonic
plates are moving towards each other or sliding alongside each other.
If the United States which
are
located on tectonic plate boundaries. Large earthquakes are usually
interplate earthquakes.
2.Intraplate earthquakes
These occur in the
middle of tectonic plates on fault zones where the pressure of the
tectonic plate being squashed and forced to move builds up and is
released through the cracks in rocks associated with fault zones,
resulting in an earthquake.
The largest recorded
earthquake in the world was a magnitude 9.5 in Chile on May 22, There
were attempts to correlate it with phases of the Moon? With seasons
,weather Sunspots and solar cycles? . Every prediction method makes
lucky hits, but none of them really worked .Lay people reinvent these
hypotheses anyway.
Scientists have moved on to
more sophisticated guesses, but with little more success. It doesn't
matter, for instance, how long it has been since the last earthquake
along a particular stretch of geologic fault. It doesn't matter what
fluid pressures underground are doing—rising, falling, or
fluctuating. It doesn't matter what the electrical conductivity of
the ground is doing. The behaviour
of earthquake faults is a stubborn mystery. Seismologist Yan
Kagan of UCLA said a few years ago, "It may require the
development of completely new mathematical and theoretical tools.
A team of Greek
seismologists, known as the VAN group after the names of its leaders
(Panayotis Varotsos, Kessar Alexopoulos, and Kostas Nomicos of the
University of Athens), has long claimed to make useful predictions
from a complicated network of signal detectors in electric power
lines of many kilometres
length. But a dedicated group of critics has kept the VAN group on
its mettle. The debate was formalized in 1996 in Geophysical
Research Letters.
The VAN group responded to each of 16 Comments with a formal Reply.
In some cases the exchange continued further, a sign of strong
disagreement over basic matters. These days their work seems to be
ignored generally, although Seiya Uyeda continues similar research
with his group in Japan.The overwhelming consensus of the
meeting was that earthquake prediction, in the popular sense of
deterministic short-term prediction, is not possible at present. Most
of the participants also agreed that the chaotic, highly non-linear
.The word "chaotic"
is significant, because the mathematics of chaos is a step forward.
The pattern of earthquakes along a fault resembles other chaotic
phenomena like the avalanching of a sand pile under a random rain of
sand grains—while each individual occurrence is unpredictable, the
bulk result can be modeled quite precisely. In the case of the sand
pile, the bulk result is a cone with sides at the angle of repose.
For earthquakes it is an overall level of energy release that matches
the tectonic movement of the earth's plates. From that information we
can confidently map the expected long-term hazards for a region—that
is, we can construct long-term forecasts.
This is vitally useful for planners, emergency agencies, and
designers of buildings and other structures.
Because we don’t know
enough about plate tectonics. “We basically have a 50-year-old
science, compared with most other sciences, which are hundreds of
years old,” says Chris Goldfinger, director of the Active Tectonics
and Seafloor Mapping Laboratory at Oregon State University. By
SCIENCE most us inclined to think about 'the systematic and
objective study ' which has developed during Renaissance
-Deterministic and reductionistic approach -with the backing of
celebrated 17th
Century mathematics-known now as Cartesian determinism . Development
of quantum mechanics , non-linear dynamics ,chaos and collective
phenomenon and Self Organised Systems[SOS] has brought a paradigm
shift to the basic concepts -still Newtonian mechanics is applicable
as valid approximation -stretching beyond its domain of
applicability gives erroneous results.
Chris
Goldfinger's optimism stems from that tradition, the sacrosanct
principle was casualty-which entails that there is a cause to every
effect – applying the method of reductions a single cause- to a
single effect was attributed – a close look at any physical
phenomenon reveals another aspects .There
are multiple causes known and unknown -same is the case with effects
there will be cascading effect of multiples causes and precise
prediction is impossible – it just a hope that more development in
science and technology will make precise prediction possible .
Every answer to a problem bring more questions as well . Leaving all
these philosophical and technical details let
us consider a simple example take a wooden meter scale ,bend it by
applying torque at both ends it may brake if the torque is
sufficient- can we predict exact spot in which it will break ,if we
repeat the experiment with another
wooden scale -what
about the shape of the broken boundary -it looks just like the
boundary of a cloud or snow flake – Three-body
problem by Henri
Poincaré in 1890. He later proposed that such phenomena could be
common, for example, in meteorology.
In 1961, Edward Lorenz coined the 'The butterfly
effect' and proved how precis prediction of weather is impossible
It is interesting to note
the case of , Italian
courts convicted six scientists and a government official—all
members of the National Commission for the Forecast and Prevention of
Major Risks—of manslaughter for giving "incomplete,
imprecise and contradictory" information in the days leading
up to an earthquake that struck L'Aquila on April 6, 2009. Tens of
thousands of buildings were destroyed, 1000 people were injured, and
308 people died, and the courts believe it was because scientists
didn't
do enough to warn civilians of the risk of a devastating quake.
Unpredictability -self similarity ,fractal nature in space and time are common features of all self organized systems .These are classic examples of open systems, takes inputs from outside -cascading effect of multiple causes takes away the deterministic trajectory . In sociology and politics it is much more visible as the smallest component participating in the structure formation is the individuals -we people .How many of us were able to predict the exponential growth of a political party known as AAP in India.Even its strongest opponents was not able to foresaw its fall from height of high morality, ethics and propriety . The sudden growth of civilization in Greece,renaissance -rise and fall of Hitler and Stalin and History as an open book will teach us more .